<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (5) TMI 232 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166122</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted the refund of countervailing duty on Porcelain Plug Valves due to misclassification as porcelain ware components. However, the claim for exemption on Explosion Proof Lighting Fixtures was denied as the fixtures were deemed standalone lighting components, not integral machinery parts. The judgment clarified the classification criteria for duty purposes based on the nature and function of the imported goods, ensuring consistency in tariff application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2014 13:12:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=363810" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (5) TMI 232 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166122</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted the refund of countervailing duty on Porcelain Plug Valves due to misclassification as porcelain ware components. However, the claim for exemption on Explosion Proof Lighting Fixtures was denied as the fixtures were deemed standalone lighting components, not integral machinery parts. The judgment clarified the classification criteria for duty purposes based on the nature and function of the imported goods, ensuring consistency in tariff application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166122</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>