<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (5) TMI 230 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166120</link>
    <description>Harrow discs and coal-cutting picks manufactured by forging were treated as forged products under Tariff Item 26AA, because the goods had consistently been described and accepted by the Department in that classification before and after Tariff Item 68 was introduced. A later shift to the residuary entry was held unsustainable where the lower orders gave no rational or speaking basis for denying the forged character already accepted for similar goods, and finishing operations did not displace that basic character. The reclassification was therefore set aside, and the demand and allied findings were annulled with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 May 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2014 12:00:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=363800" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (5) TMI 230 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166120</link>
      <description>Harrow discs and coal-cutting picks manufactured by forging were treated as forged products under Tariff Item 26AA, because the goods had consistently been described and accepted by the Department in that classification before and after Tariff Item 68 was introduced. A later shift to the residuary entry was held unsustainable where the lower orders gave no rational or speaking basis for denying the forged character already accepted for similar goods, and finishing operations did not displace that basic character. The reclassification was therefore set aside, and the demand and allied findings were annulled with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 May 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166120</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>