<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (5) TMI 230 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166120</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the lower authorities&#039; orders. It determined that the products were forged and fell under T.I. 26AA, exempt from duty under Notification No. 31/76-C.E. The sudden change in classification lacked justification, rendering the demand for duty unenforceable and time-barred. The appellant was granted consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 May 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2014 12:00:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=363800" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (5) TMI 230 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166120</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the lower authorities&#039; orders. It determined that the products were forged and fell under T.I. 26AA, exempt from duty under Notification No. 31/76-C.E. The sudden change in classification lacked justification, rendering the demand for duty unenforceable and time-barred. The appellant was granted consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 May 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166120</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>