https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166119 The Tribunal upheld the extended limitation period for demand of duty due to wilful suppression of facts and rejected the exemption claim for textile machinery parts. However, it granted relief by excluding the sale of nickel scrap from total clearances. The appeal was mostly dismissed, with a fine of Rs. 20,000/- in lieu of confiscation and a penalty of Rs. 6 lakhs deemed appropriate. en-us Wed, 11 May 1983 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Aug 2014 11:54:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166119 The Tribunal upheld the extended limitation period for demand of duty due to wilful suppression of facts and rejected the exemption claim for textile machinery parts. However, it granted relief by excluding the sale of nickel scrap from total clearances. The appeal was mostly dismissed, with a fine of Rs. 20,000/- in lieu of confiscation and a penalty of Rs. 6 lakhs deemed appropriate. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 11 May 1983 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166119