https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166105 The Tribunal dismissed the appellant's application for a stay of the confiscation order issued by the Additional Collector of Customs, Ahmedabad, concerning a motor vehicle. The decision was based on the provisions of Section 126 of the Customs Act, which vests the property of confiscated goods in the Central Government, mandating Customs authorities to take possession. Despite arguments about the defective nature of the Collector's order for not offering a redemption option as required by Section 125 of the Customs Act, the Tribunal held that the Customs officers were obligated to take possession of the vehicle, ultimately denying the stay petition. en-us Tue, 03 May 1983 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Aug 2014 18:36:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166105 The Tribunal dismissed the appellant's application for a stay of the confiscation order issued by the Additional Collector of Customs, Ahmedabad, concerning a motor vehicle. The decision was based on the provisions of Section 126 of the Customs Act, which vests the property of confiscated goods in the Central Government, mandating Customs authorities to take possession. Despite arguments about the defective nature of the Collector's order for not offering a redemption option as required by Section 125 of the Customs Act, the Tribunal held that the Customs officers were obligated to take possession of the vehicle, ultimately denying the stay petition. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 03 May 1983 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166105