https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166104 The Tribunal upheld the lower authorities' orders regarding the interpretation of the entry for Sorbitol at Sr. No. 392 of Appendix 5, stating that Sorbitol solution should be covered under this entry. It was also determined that import licenses endorsed for permission to import goods under Open General License were not valid for Sorbitol solution. The Tribunal agreed that Sorbitol and Sorbitol solution were not separate entities but rather the same, leading to the dismissal of the appeal based on these findings. The request for a detention certificate was not considered as it was not within the Tribunal's jurisdiction. en-us Fri, 29 Apr 1983 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Aug 2014 18:16:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166104 The Tribunal upheld the lower authorities' orders regarding the interpretation of the entry for Sorbitol at Sr. No. 392 of Appendix 5, stating that Sorbitol solution should be covered under this entry. It was also determined that import licenses endorsed for permission to import goods under Open General License were not valid for Sorbitol solution. The Tribunal agreed that Sorbitol and Sorbitol solution were not separate entities but rather the same, leading to the dismissal of the appeal based on these findings. The request for a detention certificate was not considered as it was not within the Tribunal's jurisdiction. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 29 Apr 1983 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166104