<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 748 - CESTAT  MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250798</link>
    <description>The tribunal granted an unconditional waiver from further pre-deposits and stayed the recovery of duty demands and penalties, acknowledging the appellant&#039;s strong case supported by expert opinions and legal precedents. The appellant successfully challenged the duty demand confirmation based on process loss explanation, emphasizing the lack of concrete evidence of duty evasion by the Revenue and presenting compelling evidence to support their contention that process losses were inherent in their manufacturing process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2014 17:29:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=363770" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 748 - CESTAT  MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250798</link>
      <description>The tribunal granted an unconditional waiver from further pre-deposits and stayed the recovery of duty demands and penalties, acknowledging the appellant&#039;s strong case supported by expert opinions and legal precedents. The appellant successfully challenged the duty demand confirmation based on process loss explanation, emphasizing the lack of concrete evidence of duty evasion by the Revenue and presenting compelling evidence to support their contention that process losses were inherent in their manufacturing process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250798</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>