<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 747 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250797</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the stay petition, set aside the Order-in-Original, and remanded the case to the Adjudicating Authority for re-decision after finding the order deficient for not being a speaking order. The Appellants were directed to provide a comprehensive reply with relevant documents, emphasizing the need for proper consideration of contentions and invoices supporting Cenvat Credit eligibility.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2014 17:28:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=363769" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 747 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250797</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the stay petition, set aside the Order-in-Original, and remanded the case to the Adjudicating Authority for re-decision after finding the order deficient for not being a speaking order. The Appellants were directed to provide a comprehensive reply with relevant documents, emphasizing the need for proper consideration of contentions and invoices supporting Cenvat Credit eligibility.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250797</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>