<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 735 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250785</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the Tribunal correctly determined that the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) lacked jurisdiction but erred in remanding the matter back to the same authority. The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision and allowed the appellant to file an appeal before the Tribunal against the provisional release orders. The Tribunal was directed to examine and dispose of the appeal on merits promptly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2015 12:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=363733" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 735 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250785</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the Tribunal correctly determined that the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) lacked jurisdiction but erred in remanding the matter back to the same authority. The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision and allowed the appellant to file an appeal before the Tribunal against the provisional release orders. The Tribunal was directed to examine and dispose of the appeal on merits promptly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250785</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>