https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166066 Section 482 CrPC remains available despite alternative remedies under the Gold (Control) Act and the Criminal Procedure Code when the challenge concerns jurisdiction or abuse of process, so the presence of appeal or revision is not a complete bar. Section 110(2) of the Gold (Control) Act was treated as a post-inquiry delivery provision directed to the police officer, not as an express ouster of a Magistrate's power to dispose of seized property under the Code. On that approach, an order returning the gold to the complainant was not inherently illegal, and separate customs action remained open. en-us Thu, 19 Aug 1982 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Aug 2014 10:38:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166066 Section 482 CrPC remains available despite alternative remedies under the Gold (Control) Act and the Criminal Procedure Code when the challenge concerns jurisdiction or abuse of process, so the presence of appeal or revision is not a complete bar. Section 110(2) of the Gold (Control) Act was treated as a post-inquiry delivery provision directed to the police officer, not as an express ouster of a Magistrate's power to dispose of seized property under the Code. On that approach, an order returning the gold to the complainant was not inherently illegal, and separate customs action remained open. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 19 Aug 1982 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166066