<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 730 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250780</link>
    <description>The court upheld the validity of the notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, dismissing the petitioner&#039;s challenge regarding the reasons for reopening the assessment. The court found that the reopening was justified based on provisions not deductible under the Act, leading to an alleged escapement of income. Additionally, the court emphasized that there was no true and full disclosure as per Explanation 1 to Section 147 of the Act, rejecting the petitioner&#039;s objections. Ultimately, the court dismissed the petition, deeming the petitioner&#039;s arguments as lacking merit and irrelevant to the specific issues raised in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2014 09:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=363698" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 730 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250780</link>
      <description>The court upheld the validity of the notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, dismissing the petitioner&#039;s challenge regarding the reasons for reopening the assessment. The court found that the reopening was justified based on provisions not deductible under the Act, leading to an alleged escapement of income. Additionally, the court emphasized that there was no true and full disclosure as per Explanation 1 to Section 147 of the Act, rejecting the petitioner&#039;s objections. Ultimately, the court dismissed the petition, deeming the petitioner&#039;s arguments as lacking merit and irrelevant to the specific issues raised in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250780</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>