<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 724 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250774</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal in part for statistical purposes. The disallowance of expenses was overturned as complete details were provided. The attribution of estimated interest towards work in progress was partially upheld, with a direction to re-examine a portion of the interest. The disallowance of the sales tax deferred claim was remanded for fresh consideration based on the revised computation. The treatment of interest income was decided in favor of the assessee, directing the AO to classify it as business income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2014 08:59:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=363691" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 724 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250774</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal in part for statistical purposes. The disallowance of expenses was overturned as complete details were provided. The attribution of estimated interest towards work in progress was partially upheld, with a direction to re-examine a portion of the interest. The disallowance of the sales tax deferred claim was remanded for fresh consideration based on the revised computation. The treatment of interest income was decided in favor of the assessee, directing the AO to classify it as business income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250774</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>