https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250772 The tribunal allowed the appellant's appeal for statistical purposes, remanding certain issues back to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration based on the appellant's arguments. The disallowance under section 14A was remanded due to the AO not following guidelines for objective satisfaction. The disallowance of Portfolio Management fees was upheld based on precedent. Concerns regarding the addition of the write back from provision for Non-Performing Assets were found valid, leading to a remand for a fresh decision by the AO considering the appellant's contentions. en-us Wed, 20 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Aug 2014 08:57:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250772 The tribunal allowed the appellant's appeal for statistical purposes, remanding certain issues back to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration based on the appellant's arguments. The disallowance under section 14A was remanded due to the AO not following guidelines for objective satisfaction. The disallowance of Portfolio Management fees was upheld based on precedent. Concerns regarding the addition of the write back from provision for Non-Performing Assets were found valid, leading to a remand for a fresh decision by the AO considering the appellant's contentions. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 20 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250772