<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (2) TMI 309 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166060</link>
    <description>The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal CEGAT New Delhi involved a request for the refund of duty amounting to &amp;amp;8377; 12,417.55 on 91.235 MT of Muriate of Potash alleged to have been short-landed. The Tribunal allowed the appeal and ordered the refund of duty paid on the 91.235 MT of Muriate of Potash, emphasizing the importance of considering the actual quantity landed rather than relying solely on the quantity cleared for duty refund purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2014 18:02:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=363652" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (2) TMI 309 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166060</link>
      <description>The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal CEGAT New Delhi involved a request for the refund of duty amounting to &amp;amp;8377; 12,417.55 on 91.235 MT of Muriate of Potash alleged to have been short-landed. The Tribunal allowed the appeal and ordered the refund of duty paid on the 91.235 MT of Muriate of Potash, emphasizing the importance of considering the actual quantity landed rather than relying solely on the quantity cleared for duty refund purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166060</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>