<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1959 (8) TMI 42 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166050</link>
    <description>Rule against bias applies to quasi-judicial authorities unless legislation clearly permits departure from natural justice. A Minister&#039;s administrative role alone does not establish disqualifying bias; reliable evidence of a closed mind or personal involvement in the relevant undertaking is required. Existing transport permits cannot be cancelled or rendered ineffective without due notice and a reasonable opportunity to be heard under the statutory scheme. However, writ relief may be refused despite defective notice where affected operators have withdrawn, replacement services have commenced, and a fresh hearing would be an empty formality.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 22:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=363639" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1959 (8) TMI 42 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166050</link>
      <description>Rule against bias applies to quasi-judicial authorities unless legislation clearly permits departure from natural justice. A Minister&#039;s administrative role alone does not establish disqualifying bias; reliable evidence of a closed mind or personal involvement in the relevant undertaking is required. Existing transport permits cannot be cancelled or rendered ineffective without due notice and a reasonable opportunity to be heard under the statutory scheme. However, writ relief may be refused despite defective notice where affected operators have withdrawn, replacement services have commenced, and a fresh hearing would be an empty formality.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166050</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>