<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (1) TMI 276 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166047</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the Appellate Collector of Customs&#039; decision. The refund claim was deemed time-barred under Section 27(1) of the Customs Act. The Respondent was denied the right to file cross-objections, as they lacked the right to appeal. The Tribunal affirmed its adherence to statutory limitations, rejecting the application of Section 72 of the Indian Contract Act to extend the limitation period. The issue of reduced duty rates was not addressed due to the decisive nature of the limitation matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2014 15:34:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=363636" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (1) TMI 276 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166047</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the Appellate Collector of Customs&#039; decision. The refund claim was deemed time-barred under Section 27(1) of the Customs Act. The Respondent was denied the right to file cross-objections, as they lacked the right to appeal. The Tribunal affirmed its adherence to statutory limitations, rejecting the application of Section 72 of the Indian Contract Act to extend the limitation period. The issue of reduced duty rates was not addressed due to the decisive nature of the limitation matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166047</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>