<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (12) TMI 215 - Punjab and Haryana High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166041</link>
    <description>The court upheld the validity of the show cause notice issued by Customs authorities and confirmed the confiscation of the truck and goods. However, it deemed the orders preventing redemption of the truck on payment of a fine as unjustified, particularly the increased redemption amount. The court allowed the petition partially, setting aside the orders disallowing redemption for the higher sum and granting the petitioner the right to redeem the truck on payment of the original fine amount. The authorities were criticized for lacking a legal basis for the increased redemption sum, and no additional compensation was awarded to the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2014 14:10:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=363630" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (12) TMI 215 - Punjab and Haryana High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166041</link>
      <description>The court upheld the validity of the show cause notice issued by Customs authorities and confirmed the confiscation of the truck and goods. However, it deemed the orders preventing redemption of the truck on payment of a fine as unjustified, particularly the increased redemption amount. The court allowed the petition partially, setting aside the orders disallowing redemption for the higher sum and granting the petitioner the right to redeem the truck on payment of the original fine amount. The authorities were criticized for lacking a legal basis for the increased redemption sum, and no additional compensation was awarded to the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166041</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>