https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250757 The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the service tax demand. It was determined that the services provided did not fall within the scope of Consulting Engineer Service as the appellants were engaged to execute works based on client-provided designs, not to provide consultancy. The Tribunal also found that there was no evidence of intent to evade tax or suppression of facts, rendering the allegation unsubstantiated. Additionally, it was acknowledged that companies were not covered under the Consulting Engineer category during the relevant period, further supporting the appellants' position. en-us Wed, 06 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 Jul 2015 12:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250757 The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the service tax demand. It was determined that the services provided did not fall within the scope of Consulting Engineer Service as the appellants were engaged to execute works based on client-provided designs, not to provide consultancy. The Tribunal also found that there was no evidence of intent to evade tax or suppression of facts, rendering the allegation unsubstantiated. Additionally, it was acknowledged that companies were not covered under the Consulting Engineer category during the relevant period, further supporting the appellants' position. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 06 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250757