<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 689 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250739</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the impugned orders and instructing the 2nd respondent to reevaluate the interest calculation after issuing a notice to the petitioner. The court directed the completion of this exercise within three months, ensuring the integrity of the assessment proceedings for the relevant year while addressing the specific issue of interest payment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2014 15:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=363580" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 689 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250739</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the impugned orders and instructing the 2nd respondent to reevaluate the interest calculation after issuing a notice to the petitioner. The court directed the completion of this exercise within three months, ensuring the integrity of the assessment proceedings for the relevant year while addressing the specific issue of interest payment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250739</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>