<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (2) TMI 291 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166007</link>
    <description>Extra free-sale sugar cleared under Notification No. 36/76-C.E. could not claim the concessional duty rate later prescribed for levy sugar under Notification No. 317/77-C.E., because the two notifications operated in distinct fields. Notification No. 36/76-C.E. granted exemption on its own terms for expanded factories, fixing concessional duty while pegging assessable value to the levy-sugar price, but the goods remained extra free-sale sugar and were not levy sugar under the Essential Commodities Act. Applying the plain language rule for exemption notifications, the later levy-sugar concession could not be imported by implication. Refund of duty paid in excess of the later rate was therefore not payable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2014 16:19:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=363546" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (2) TMI 291 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166007</link>
      <description>Extra free-sale sugar cleared under Notification No. 36/76-C.E. could not claim the concessional duty rate later prescribed for levy sugar under Notification No. 317/77-C.E., because the two notifications operated in distinct fields. Notification No. 36/76-C.E. granted exemption on its own terms for expanded factories, fixing concessional duty while pegging assessable value to the levy-sugar price, but the goods remained extra free-sale sugar and were not levy sugar under the Essential Commodities Act. Applying the plain language rule for exemption notifications, the later levy-sugar concession could not be imported by implication. Refund of duty paid in excess of the later rate was therefore not payable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166007</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>