<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (2) TMI 288 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166001</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that V.V. Dabke &amp;amp; Sons, as Customs House Agents, lacked the standing to file an appeal in their own right regarding duty refunds for imported designs and drawings. The agents failed to demonstrate authorization from the importers and were unable to establish themselves as aggrieved parties. As a result, the appeal was dismissed for lack of maintainability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2014 14:49:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=363540" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (2) TMI 288 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166001</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that V.V. Dabke &amp;amp; Sons, as Customs House Agents, lacked the standing to file an appeal in their own right regarding duty refunds for imported designs and drawings. The agents failed to demonstrate authorization from the importers and were unable to establish themselves as aggrieved parties. As a result, the appeal was dismissed for lack of maintainability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166001</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>