<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (3) TMI 265 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165995</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the levy of countervailing duty under Section 3(1) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, and affirmed the classification of goods under Item 68 of the Central Excise Tariff Schedule. The Tribunal rejected the appellants&#039; arguments on the levy of countervailing duty and the classification under Item 68, finding them unsustainable. The appeals were dismissed, and the orders of the Appellate Collector were deemed correct.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2014 12:54:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=363534" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (3) TMI 265 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165995</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the levy of countervailing duty under Section 3(1) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, and affirmed the classification of goods under Item 68 of the Central Excise Tariff Schedule. The Tribunal rejected the appellants&#039; arguments on the levy of countervailing duty and the classification under Item 68, finding them unsustainable. The appeals were dismissed, and the orders of the Appellate Collector were deemed correct.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165995</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>