<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (2) TMI 285 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165994</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Revenue&#039;s contention that the claims for refund of excess duty were time-barred under Section 27 of the Customs Act, 1962, as they were filed after the prescribed period of limitation and the duty was paid without protest. As a result, all four appeals were dismissed, and the issue of the correct assessable heading for the goods did not need to be addressed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2014 12:49:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=363533" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (2) TMI 285 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165994</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Revenue&#039;s contention that the claims for refund of excess duty were time-barred under Section 27 of the Customs Act, 1962, as they were filed after the prescribed period of limitation and the duty was paid without protest. As a result, all four appeals were dismissed, and the issue of the correct assessable heading for the goods did not need to be addressed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165994</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>