https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165974 Compensation for alleged loss from detention and seizure of goods was held unsuitable for writ jurisdiction where the claim turned on disputed facts and the record did not establish mala fide or unlawful action by the statutory authorities. The Court noted that the condition of the goods at detention, the extent of deterioration, and the quantum of loss were not proved by reliable material, and the detention had occurred under statutory proceedings under the Trade Tax Act. In the absence of clear evidence enabling adjudication of damages, relief under Article 226 was refused and the compensation claim was rejected. en-us Tue, 31 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 Sep 2014 09:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165974 Compensation for alleged loss from detention and seizure of goods was held unsuitable for writ jurisdiction where the claim turned on disputed facts and the record did not establish mala fide or unlawful action by the statutory authorities. The Court noted that the condition of the goods at detention, the extent of deterioration, and the quantum of loss were not proved by reliable material, and the detention had occurred under statutory proceedings under the Trade Tax Act. In the absence of clear evidence enabling adjudication of damages, relief under Article 226 was refused and the compensation claim was rejected. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 31 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165974