<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 663 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250713</link>
    <description>The judge condoned the 86-day delay in filing the appeal, despite acknowledging deficiencies in the condonation application and negligence on the part of the company and Accounts Manager. The judge considered the Accounts Manager&#039;s accident and head injury as mitigating factors, emphasizing humanitarian grounds for condonation. The judge also waived the pre-deposit requirement for the balance dues, granting a stay against recovery during the appeal&#039;s pendency.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2014 10:47:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=363477" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 663 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250713</link>
      <description>The judge condoned the 86-day delay in filing the appeal, despite acknowledging deficiencies in the condonation application and negligence on the part of the company and Accounts Manager. The judge considered the Accounts Manager&#039;s accident and head injury as mitigating factors, emphasizing humanitarian grounds for condonation. The judge also waived the pre-deposit requirement for the balance dues, granting a stay against recovery during the appeal&#039;s pendency.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250713</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>