<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 650 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250700</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court directed the Respondents to suspend coercive measures until a specified date, allowing the Petitioners time to seek interim relief. Failure to act within the given period would permit the Respondents to proceed with enforcing the impugned communications. The Court emphasized compliance with its orders, disposing of the Petitions without costs and instructing all parties to adhere to the order for clarity and enforcement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2015 10:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=363455" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 650 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250700</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court directed the Respondents to suspend coercive measures until a specified date, allowing the Petitioners time to seek interim relief. Failure to act within the given period would permit the Respondents to proceed with enforcing the impugned communications. The Court emphasized compliance with its orders, disposing of the Petitions without costs and instructing all parties to adhere to the order for clarity and enforcement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250700</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>