<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 633 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250683</link>
    <description>The Municipal Corporation was not obligated to deduct surcharge on income-tax in addition to regular tax deducted at source when making payments to contractors. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Corporation, stating there was no legal obligation to deduct the surcharge based on the interpretation of the relevant Income-tax Act provisions. Additionally, the Corporation was not liable to pay interest on the alleged short deduction of surcharge as per section 201(1A) of the Income-tax Act, with the Court supporting this decision based on previous case law. The case concluded in favor of the Corporation with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2014 08:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=363438" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 633 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250683</link>
      <description>The Municipal Corporation was not obligated to deduct surcharge on income-tax in addition to regular tax deducted at source when making payments to contractors. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Corporation, stating there was no legal obligation to deduct the surcharge based on the interpretation of the relevant Income-tax Act provisions. Additionally, the Corporation was not liable to pay interest on the alleged short deduction of surcharge as per section 201(1A) of the Income-tax Act, with the Court supporting this decision based on previous case law. The case concluded in favor of the Corporation with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250683</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>