<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 627 - CESTAT  MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250677</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning service tax demands under Commercial and Industrial Construction service and Works Contract Service. The demand for service tax on materials supplied by customers was deemed unsustainable as they were not considered part of taxable value. The Tribunal directed a reevaluation of the contracts&#039; commencement dates to determine the applicability of service tax on free material supply. Additionally, the demand based on Profit &amp;amp; Loss Account figures lacked proper classification and justification, leading to a remand for a fresh determination of the correct service tax liability. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and waived the pre-deposit requirement for the balance amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2014 11:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=363401" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 627 - CESTAT  MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250677</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning service tax demands under Commercial and Industrial Construction service and Works Contract Service. The demand for service tax on materials supplied by customers was deemed unsustainable as they were not considered part of taxable value. The Tribunal directed a reevaluation of the contracts&#039; commencement dates to determine the applicability of service tax on free material supply. Additionally, the demand based on Profit &amp;amp; Loss Account figures lacked proper classification and justification, leading to a remand for a fresh determination of the correct service tax liability. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and waived the pre-deposit requirement for the balance amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250677</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>