https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250673 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the appellant's activity did not qualify as cargo handling service. The decision was based on the lack of movement of goods from one place to another without internal movement within the mining area. The Tribunal found support in a specific contract and a decision of the Hon'ble High Court of Jharkhand, ultimately dismissing the Revenue's contentions and leading to the success of the appellant in all appeals. en-us Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 Jul 2014 16:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250673 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the appellant's activity did not qualify as cargo handling service. The decision was based on the lack of movement of goods from one place to another without internal movement within the mining area. The Tribunal found support in a specific contract and a decision of the Hon'ble High Court of Jharkhand, ultimately dismissing the Revenue's contentions and leading to the success of the appellant in all appeals. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250673