https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250663 No violation of natural justice was shown where the show-cause notice was issued with documents, the appellants initially only sought time to reply, and the alleged later adjournment request was unsupported and not shown to have reached the authority in time; the plea for total waiver of pre-deposit therefore failed. Pendency of BIFR proceedings did not justify stay or dispense with pre-deposit because the earlier BIFR order had left secured creditors and Government departments free to recover dues, and the later order relied on was not timely produced before the Tribunal. Confiscation of goods and plant and machinery did not eliminate the duty liability arising from breach of undertaking and exemption conditions, so the direction for pre-deposit was upheld and the appeals were dismissed. en-us Thu, 07 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 May 2015 14:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250663 No violation of natural justice was shown where the show-cause notice was issued with documents, the appellants initially only sought time to reply, and the alleged later adjournment request was unsupported and not shown to have reached the authority in time; the plea for total waiver of pre-deposit therefore failed. Pendency of BIFR proceedings did not justify stay or dispense with pre-deposit because the earlier BIFR order had left secured creditors and Government departments free to recover dues, and the later order relied on was not timely produced before the Tribunal. Confiscation of goods and plant and machinery did not eliminate the duty liability arising from breach of undertaking and exemption conditions, so the direction for pre-deposit was upheld and the appeals were dismissed. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 07 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250663