<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (1) TMI 250 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165938</link>
    <description>Unspecified terms in a customs exemption notification are to be construed in their trade sense, as understood by persons dealing with the goods. Applying that approach, stamping foils imported in running length form were treated as articles of embellishment for leather footwear, supported by the Export Promotion Council certificate and Import Trade Control Policy lists. The objection that the goods were not parts or components of footwear was rejected because the relevant inquiry was whether they were embellishments for footwear. The goods therefore fell within the entry for &quot;buckles and other embellishments for foot wear&quot; in Notification No. 29/79-Cus. and qualified for concessional customs duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2014 12:45:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=363329" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (1) TMI 250 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165938</link>
      <description>Unspecified terms in a customs exemption notification are to be construed in their trade sense, as understood by persons dealing with the goods. Applying that approach, stamping foils imported in running length form were treated as articles of embellishment for leather footwear, supported by the Export Promotion Council certificate and Import Trade Control Policy lists. The objection that the goods were not parts or components of footwear was rejected because the relevant inquiry was whether they were embellishments for footwear. The goods therefore fell within the entry for &quot;buckles and other embellishments for foot wear&quot; in Notification No. 29/79-Cus. and qualified for concessional customs duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165938</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>