<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (12) TMI 211 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165933</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the Revision Application filed by the Controller of Stores, Central Railways, challenging the classification of a &quot;Control Transformer&quot; under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. The Tribunal upheld the rejection of the reclassification claim, emphasizing the transformer&#039;s voltage rating below 400 volts as the basis for ineligibility. The appellant&#039;s failure to provide adequate evidence or arguments during the appeal hearing led to the Tribunal finding no legal or factual flaws in the Collector of Customs (Appeals) orders. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of competent representation in legal proceedings and advised sending qualified officers for future hearings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2014 11:08:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=363319" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (12) TMI 211 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165933</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the Revision Application filed by the Controller of Stores, Central Railways, challenging the classification of a &quot;Control Transformer&quot; under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. The Tribunal upheld the rejection of the reclassification claim, emphasizing the transformer&#039;s voltage rating below 400 volts as the basis for ineligibility. The appellant&#039;s failure to provide adequate evidence or arguments during the appeal hearing led to the Tribunal finding no legal or factual flaws in the Collector of Customs (Appeals) orders. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of competent representation in legal proceedings and advised sending qualified officers for future hearings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165933</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>