<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (12) TMI 208 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165930</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed by the Tribunal, affirming the decision of the Appellate Collector of Customs. The Tribunal held that the levy of customs duty should be based on the prevailing price of goods at the time and place of importation, as per the Customs Act. It was determined that the original contract price was not relevant for duty calculation, and the actual price paid by the appellants for the first 5,000 metric tonnes was not disputed. Therefore, the rejection of the refund claim was upheld, and the appellants&#039; appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2014 10:46:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=363316" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (12) TMI 208 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165930</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed by the Tribunal, affirming the decision of the Appellate Collector of Customs. The Tribunal held that the levy of customs duty should be based on the prevailing price of goods at the time and place of importation, as per the Customs Act. It was determined that the original contract price was not relevant for duty calculation, and the actual price paid by the appellants for the first 5,000 metric tonnes was not disputed. Therefore, the rejection of the refund claim was upheld, and the appellants&#039; appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165930</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>