<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (12) TMI 206 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165928</link>
    <description>A claim for refund or adjustment of differential customs duty, based on a revised basis for inspection charges introduced only after duty payment, was treated as a fresh claim. Because it was raised beyond the statutory time limit, the claim was barred by limitation under Section 27 of the Customs Act, 1962. The appeal failed on that ground.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2014 10:32:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=363314" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (12) TMI 206 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165928</link>
      <description>A claim for refund or adjustment of differential customs duty, based on a revised basis for inspection charges introduced only after duty payment, was treated as a fresh claim. Because it was raised beyond the statutory time limit, the claim was barred by limitation under Section 27 of the Customs Act, 1962. The appeal failed on that ground.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165928</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>