<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (12) TMI 204 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165926</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT New Delhi ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning the classification of imported pressure transducers under the Customs Tariff Schedule. The Tribunal determined that the goods should be classified under Chapter 90, specifically Heading No. 90.24 for instruments and apparatus for measuring pressure, rejecting the Customs authorities&#039; classification under Heading No. 85.18/27 for mounted piezo-electric crystals. The Tribunal directed the Customs authorities to reassess the goods at the correct duty rate and refund any excess duty paid by the appellants, emphasizing the importance of accurate classification based on the nature and use of the goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2014 10:18:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=363312" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (12) TMI 204 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165926</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT New Delhi ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning the classification of imported pressure transducers under the Customs Tariff Schedule. The Tribunal determined that the goods should be classified under Chapter 90, specifically Heading No. 90.24 for instruments and apparatus for measuring pressure, rejecting the Customs authorities&#039; classification under Heading No. 85.18/27 for mounted piezo-electric crystals. The Tribunal directed the Customs authorities to reassess the goods at the correct duty rate and refund any excess duty paid by the appellants, emphasizing the importance of accurate classification based on the nature and use of the goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165926</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>