<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 586 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250636</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted the appellant&#039;s request for the recall of the final order and restoration of the appeal. This decision was based on the change in legal requirements for Committee on Disputes (COD) clearance for public sector undertakings following the Supreme Court&#039;s decision. The Tribunal considered the appellant&#039;s pending application to the COD at the time of the Supreme Court&#039;s revocation of the mechanism, which rendered them unable to obtain COD clearance. Aligning with the Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC) instruction and the changed legal landscape, the Tribunal allowed the application, restoring the appeal and reviving the stay application for a scheduled hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2014 08:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=363283" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 586 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250636</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted the appellant&#039;s request for the recall of the final order and restoration of the appeal. This decision was based on the change in legal requirements for Committee on Disputes (COD) clearance for public sector undertakings following the Supreme Court&#039;s decision. The Tribunal considered the appellant&#039;s pending application to the COD at the time of the Supreme Court&#039;s revocation of the mechanism, which rendered them unable to obtain COD clearance. Aligning with the Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC) instruction and the changed legal landscape, the Tribunal allowed the application, restoring the appeal and reviving the stay application for a scheduled hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250636</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>