https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250634 The tribunal ruled in favor of the applicant, finding that the denial of the refund for the Gurgaon unit under Notification No. 5/2006-C.E. was not justified. It was determined that the applicant had exported services from the Gurgaon unit, and the invoices for export proceedings were raised by another unit. The tribunal waived the pre-deposit of dues and stayed the recovery of the amount until the appeal was resolved, based on the presence of export activities and common registration for three units. en-us Fri, 16 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Aug 2014 08:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250634 The tribunal ruled in favor of the applicant, finding that the denial of the refund for the Gurgaon unit under Notification No. 5/2006-C.E. was not justified. It was determined that the applicant had exported services from the Gurgaon unit, and the invoices for export proceedings were raised by another unit. The tribunal waived the pre-deposit of dues and stayed the recovery of the amount until the appeal was resolved, based on the presence of export activities and common registration for three units. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 16 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250634