https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250633 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD rejected the appellant's arguments for penalty waiver under Section 78 and invoking Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994, due to differences in facts from the precedent case cited. However, the Tribunal allowed the appellant to pay 25% of the penalty amount within 30 days to avoid the full penalty. Failure to meet this deadline would result in a penalty equal to the Service Tax demanded. The appeal was rejected except for this relief, emphasizing the importance of timely tax payment and compliance to avoid penalties. en-us Wed, 14 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Aug 2014 08:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250633 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD rejected the appellant's arguments for penalty waiver under Section 78 and invoking Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994, due to differences in facts from the precedent case cited. However, the Tribunal allowed the appellant to pay 25% of the penalty amount within 30 days to avoid the full penalty. Failure to meet this deadline would result in a penalty equal to the Service Tax demanded. The appeal was rejected except for this relief, emphasizing the importance of timely tax payment and compliance to avoid penalties. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 14 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250633