<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 569 - CESTAT  CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250619</link>
    <description>Interest is payable on differential central excise duty paid through supplementary invoices issued after a price increase, where the additional duty arises from price escalation. The Tribunal applied the binding Supreme Court position on supplementary-invoice duty differentials and found no basis to interfere with the order under challenge. Interest was therefore held payable under Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944 on the differential duty, and the appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2014 08:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=363266" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 569 - CESTAT  CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250619</link>
      <description>Interest is payable on differential central excise duty paid through supplementary invoices issued after a price increase, where the additional duty arises from price escalation. The Tribunal applied the binding Supreme Court position on supplementary-invoice duty differentials and found no basis to interfere with the order under challenge. Interest was therefore held payable under Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944 on the differential duty, and the appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250619</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>