<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 566 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250616</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ruling that the deemed credit under the CENVAT Incentive Scheme should be included in business profits for deduction under section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act. The Court determined that the CENVAT incentives qualified as export incentives, enhancing business profits eligible for deduction. The appeal was dismissed as the Court found no error in the ITAT&#039;s decision, concluding that no substantial legal question arose for consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2014 08:25:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=363263" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 566 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250616</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ruling that the deemed credit under the CENVAT Incentive Scheme should be included in business profits for deduction under section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act. The Court determined that the CENVAT incentives qualified as export incentives, enhancing business profits eligible for deduction. The appeal was dismissed as the Court found no error in the ITAT&#039;s decision, concluding that no substantial legal question arose for consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250616</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>