<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (12) TMI 191 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165909</link>
    <description>Imported grinding wheels qualified for the lower tariff rate only if the importers proved that they were made of synthetic abrasive grains under Item 71(12) of the erstwhile Indian Customs Tariff. The manufacturer&#039;s certificate alone was treated as insufficient without catalogue extracts, technical literature, or other corroborative material linking the specific goods to synthetic abrasive grains. As the import documents described the goods only as grinding wheels and no supporting correspondence or contract evidence was produced despite opportunity, the burden of proof was not discharged and the higher classification was maintained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2014 15:12:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=363225" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (12) TMI 191 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165909</link>
      <description>Imported grinding wheels qualified for the lower tariff rate only if the importers proved that they were made of synthetic abrasive grains under Item 71(12) of the erstwhile Indian Customs Tariff. The manufacturer&#039;s certificate alone was treated as insufficient without catalogue extracts, technical literature, or other corroborative material linking the specific goods to synthetic abrasive grains. As the import documents described the goods only as grinding wheels and no supporting correspondence or contract evidence was produced despite opportunity, the burden of proof was not discharged and the higher classification was maintained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165909</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>