<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 555 - CESTAT  CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250605</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the applicant, a job worker of M/s. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., in a case involving excise duty and service tax liabilities. The Tribunal found that the processes undertaken by the applicant, such as cutting, drilling, and welding steel plates into boiler components, qualified for exemption under relevant notifications. It was determined that the job work materials were used in the manufacture of final products, leading to the waiver of tax, interest, and penalty pending appeal. The Tribunal emphasized previous decisions supporting the classification of job work activities as manufacturing, ultimately siding with the applicant and staying recovery pending appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2015 15:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=363219" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 555 - CESTAT  CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250605</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the applicant, a job worker of M/s. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., in a case involving excise duty and service tax liabilities. The Tribunal found that the processes undertaken by the applicant, such as cutting, drilling, and welding steel plates into boiler components, qualified for exemption under relevant notifications. It was determined that the job work materials were used in the manufacture of final products, leading to the waiver of tax, interest, and penalty pending appeal. The Tribunal emphasized previous decisions supporting the classification of job work activities as manufacturing, ultimately siding with the applicant and staying recovery pending appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250605</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>