<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 540 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250590</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging a tax payment proposal notice as premature. The petitioner was directed to file objections and attend a personal hearing before the authority. Emphasizing the importance of personal hearings, the court granted the petitioner the opportunity to present relevant documents to support their case. No costs were imposed, and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed following the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2014 14:17:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=363200" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 540 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250590</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging a tax payment proposal notice as premature. The petitioner was directed to file objections and attend a personal hearing before the authority. Emphasizing the importance of personal hearings, the court granted the petitioner the opportunity to present relevant documents to support their case. No costs were imposed, and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed following the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250590</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>