https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250579 The judgment upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) in a case involving excess dyed fabrics, allegations of clandestine activities, duty confirmation, and penalties. The appellants' capacity to manufacture the alleged quantity was questioned, but the court found insufficient evidence to support the claims. Private diary entries were deemed inadmissible as concrete evidence. The decision was based on a thorough assessment of the issues, including capacity evaluation, lack of substantial evidence for clandestine activities, and the legal inadmissibility of private diary entries. en-us Thu, 13 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 Aug 2014 08:17:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250579 The judgment upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) in a case involving excess dyed fabrics, allegations of clandestine activities, duty confirmation, and penalties. The appellants' capacity to manufacture the alleged quantity was questioned, but the court found insufficient evidence to support the claims. Private diary entries were deemed inadmissible as concrete evidence. The decision was based on a thorough assessment of the issues, including capacity evaluation, lack of substantial evidence for clandestine activities, and the legal inadmissibility of private diary entries. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 13 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250579