<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 494 - CESTAT  MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250544</link>
    <description>An appeal to the Tribunal does not lie against a Commissioner (Appeals) order passed under Section 129E directing pre-deposit of duty, because Tribunal jurisdiction under Section 129A is confined to decisions or orders passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) acting as an adjudicating authority under Section 128A. An order made only for pre-deposit purposes is outside that appellate scope and is therefore not maintainable before the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2014 17:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=363131" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 494 - CESTAT  MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250544</link>
      <description>An appeal to the Tribunal does not lie against a Commissioner (Appeals) order passed under Section 129E directing pre-deposit of duty, because Tribunal jurisdiction under Section 129A is confined to decisions or orders passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) acting as an adjudicating authority under Section 128A. An order made only for pre-deposit purposes is outside that appellate scope and is therefore not maintainable before the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250544</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>