<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 483 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250533</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to cancel the penalty under Section 140A(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It ruled that the penalty was unjustified as the assessee filed a valid revised return, substituting the original return and paid the admitted tax liability, thereby nullifying any basis for penalty imposition. The Tribunal emphasized that filing a revised return within the prescribed period and paying the tax liability at that time negates the applicability of penalty provisions under Section 140A(3).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2014 09:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=363120" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 483 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250533</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to cancel the penalty under Section 140A(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It ruled that the penalty was unjustified as the assessee filed a valid revised return, substituting the original return and paid the admitted tax liability, thereby nullifying any basis for penalty imposition. The Tribunal emphasized that filing a revised return within the prescribed period and paying the tax liability at that time negates the applicability of penalty provisions under Section 140A(3).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250533</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>