<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Determining Proper Notice u/s 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act Should Occur During Evidence Stage, Not Preemptively.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=19693</link>
    <description>Proof of service of notice under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - service of notice is a matter of evidence and proof and it would be premature at the stage of issuance of process to move the High Court for quashing of the proceeding under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C - SC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2014 20:30:25 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2014 20:30:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=363114" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Determining Proper Notice u/s 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act Should Occur During Evidence Stage, Not Preemptively.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=19693</link>
      <description>Proof of service of notice under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - service of notice is a matter of evidence and proof and it would be premature at the stage of issuance of process to move the High Court for quashing of the proceeding under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C - SC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2014 20:30:25 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=19693</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>