<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 482 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250532</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the tax appeals due to a significant delay in filing, as the appellants failed to provide justifiable reasons for condonation. The court stressed the importance of adhering to procedural timelines and did not address the merits of issues regarding exemption eligibility, divisibility of service tax liability, and nonpayment violations under the Finance Act, 1994. The decision highlighted the need for satisfactory explanations for delays to uphold the administration of justice effectively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2015 16:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=363108" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 482 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250532</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the tax appeals due to a significant delay in filing, as the appellants failed to provide justifiable reasons for condonation. The court stressed the importance of adhering to procedural timelines and did not address the merits of issues regarding exemption eligibility, divisibility of service tax liability, and nonpayment violations under the Finance Act, 1994. The decision highlighted the need for satisfactory explanations for delays to uphold the administration of justice effectively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250532</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>