<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 481 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250531</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the writ petition, directing the Revenue to pay interest to the petitioner at a rate of six percent per annum for the specified period. The Court clarified that the petitioner was entitled to interest under section 35FF of the Central Excise Act, 1944, due to the proper communication of the order to the adjudicating authority. The decision emphasized compliance within a set timeframe and upheld the petitioner&#039;s right to receive interest on the refund amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2015 11:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=363107" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 481 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250531</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the writ petition, directing the Revenue to pay interest to the petitioner at a rate of six percent per annum for the specified period. The Court clarified that the petitioner was entitled to interest under section 35FF of the Central Excise Act, 1944, due to the proper communication of the order to the adjudicating authority. The decision emphasized compliance within a set timeframe and upheld the petitioner&#039;s right to receive interest on the refund amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250531</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>