<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 480 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250530</link>
    <description>Service tax on LPG bottling in cylinders was challenged on the footing that the activity did not prima facie fall under Business Auxiliary Service. The Tribunal noted earlier appellate treatment of LPG bottling as Packaging Service and found that the present demand, based on an ancillary-to-sale-and-marketing theory, was not clearly sustainable at the interim stage. On that prima facie assessment, it granted complete waiver of pre-deposit and stayed recovery pending appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2014 09:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=363106" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 480 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250530</link>
      <description>Service tax on LPG bottling in cylinders was challenged on the footing that the activity did not prima facie fall under Business Auxiliary Service. The Tribunal noted earlier appellate treatment of LPG bottling as Packaging Service and found that the present demand, based on an ancillary-to-sale-and-marketing theory, was not clearly sustainable at the interim stage. On that prima facie assessment, it granted complete waiver of pre-deposit and stayed recovery pending appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250530</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>