<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 467 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250517</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that appeals against communication of arrears of revenue were maintainable and could be decided during stay petition hearings. The case involved duty demand and penalty imposition on a company manufacturing Mercerized Cotton Yarn. The communication for payment of penalty was found not appealable, emphasizing the need for accurate quantification of demands. The appeals were dismissed for lack of maintainability, with the stay applications disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2014 09:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=363093" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 467 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250517</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that appeals against communication of arrears of revenue were maintainable and could be decided during stay petition hearings. The case involved duty demand and penalty imposition on a company manufacturing Mercerized Cotton Yarn. The communication for payment of penalty was found not appealable, emphasizing the need for accurate quantification of demands. The appeals were dismissed for lack of maintainability, with the stay applications disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250517</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>